He has been called a tyrant, a dictator, a modern-day Hitler, an elitist - incongruous epithets for a man who likes the color pink.

But Bayani Fernando, chairman of the Metro Manila Development Authority, says he does not mind the labels. As the "supermayor" of the 17 cities and towns that make up Metro Manila, he is far too busy to take offense at names.

Fernando, 58, is in charge of a megalopolis of more than 13 million people - one of the noisiest, most congested and most polluted cities in the world.

The metropolitan area, which covers 630 square kilometers, or 240 square miles, is notorious for its traffic. The sheer number of vehicles staggers the imagination.

Undisciplined drivers weave around street vendors, competing with the ubiquitous jeepney, the gaudy vans devised from World War II military Jeeps that are the main mode of transportation here.

Street crime is rampant. A good portion of the population resides in shantytowns and on the streets, tens of thousands of them living off the 6,700 tons of garbage the metropolis generates daily.

Of this garbage, 1,500 tons a day are dumped into creeks, rivers and Manila Bay, which reeks, discouraging people from watching its famed sunset. Floods caused by trash that clogs the waterways are a common occurrence.

Manila sunset

Although Metro Manila is far from perfect under Fernando, many agree it has improved. He increased garbage collection and has been trying to unclog the waterways and sewers.

Many Manila sectors are still congested, but the main roads and highways have become more orderly.

Fernando assigned separate lanes for buses. He built U-turn slots that ensure the continuous flow of traffic, closing off intersections to prevent jeepneys and buses from turning these areas into veritable terminals.

He also built footbridges to discourage jaywalking and bus shelters for pedestrians.

He even dotted the major roads and highways with urinals for men, whose habit of urinating anywhere they please contributes to the stink and results as well in what is possibly uniquely Metro Manilan: iron doors and gates corroded by urine.

Then Fernando added his signature touch: He painted all the pedestrian structures pink.

Pink, he says, "has a calming effect. It provides a refreshing contrast. It can help commuters calm down when they're stuck in traffic."

Today, Metro Manila is awash with pink. A bit kitschy, but it does provide a respite from the drab surroundings of dilapidated buildings, smoke-belching buses, and torn movie billboards.

Fernando also built new bus terminals to discourage buses from picking up passengers anywhere they please.

Map of Manila

He built grills and railings on the sidewalks that practically herd passengers straight to the mouths of buses.

At the same time, he implemented a "wet flag" scheme: Pedestrians who stray off the sidewalks are slapped with wet rags hoisted on Metro Manila Development Authority trucks.

For all this, Fernando has earned both admiration and derision. But all agree he has the one quality people feel Metro Manila needs: political will.

Past mayors of Metro Manila have refused to demolish squatter shanties and illegal stores on streets and sidewalks for fear of reprisals by voters.

But Fernando, who is a presidential appointee, does not have to worry about that. Although the demolitions often have turned violent - a handful of people have died and dozens have been injured - Fernando has stepped in on several occasions to direct them himself.

Fernando gets his mandate from President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo, and he has no qualms about dropping her name.

Once, when environmentalists and residents complained about tree-cutting by the development authority, Fernando shot back: "I have the blessing of the president." He is among the very few who can say that and not fear political reprisal. "My mandate is very clear: run Metro Manila as efficiently as I see fit," Fernando said in an interview. "If people have a problem with that, that's their problem."

Many of the mayors of the towns and cities that constitute Metro Manila certainly have a problem with somebody who encroaches on their turf and tells them how to run their communities. At least one city, historic old Manila, the heart of the capital, has declared Fernando persona non grata. Others among the 17 have threatened to haul him to court.

"I wish he'd tell us first, consult us first, before he does anything that affects our community and our residents," says Peewee Trinidad, the mayor of Pasay City.

"I don't have to do that" is a typical Fernando retort to such complaints.

A creation of the late dictator Ferdinand Marcos in 1975, the Metro Manila Development Authority was given the tasks of centralizing collection of garbage, managing traffic and overseeing maintenance of Metro Manila's sewers. Marcos combined the 17 adjacent cities, which had by then begun to swell, and turned the metropolitan area into a province - first run by his wife, Imelda.

Some say that the Metro Manila Development Authority's dictatorial roots could be the reason why its leaders, and most of all Fernando, have tended to impose their will on others.

But that would be ignoring Fernando's background.

When he became mayor of Marikina, a riverside city north of Manila that was once one of the Philippines' most congested cities, more than a decade ago, Fernando, an engineer, put it in order: He demolished sidewalk stalls, widened the roads, cleaned the riverside, painted the walls. The city even made it illegal to walk the streets shirtless. And, yes, he painted the city pink.

A survey named Marikina the "most livable city" in the country, and Fernando went on to win two more terms, serving a total of nine years. His wife, Marides, is now the mayor.

When he was appointed to the Metro Manila Development Authority in 2002, Fernando wasted no time in transforming the disheveled and disorderly Metro Manila into a bigger Marikina.

"Kudos, Fernando. We are solidly behind, in front and around you," Raul Fabella, an economist, wrote to a newspaper. Fernando was so well liked that he was considered last year as a vice-presidential candidate. "Is Fernando an aberration?" Fabella asked. "That partly depends on us. The fundamental lesson we can learn from Fernando is that real reforms are painful."

The critics have a different view. To them, an official who ignores the fact that those affected by his actions are poor people who are only trying to make a living in a weak economy is an aberration.

When Fernando's men chased and harassed vendors one morning in January in front of a church, a witness was so enraged that she fired off a scathing letter to Fernando. "Here are people wanting to earn an honest buck and they are denied their basic right," wrote the witness, Sharon Joy Duremdes. "Clearing the sidewalks I can understand, but must you hound and pound people? Only fascists do that."

Fernando says that he cannot be a bleeding heart. "Much as it pains me to do this, I cannot cry with the poor because if my tears blind me, who then will guide them?" he said in the interview.

In one of the many brochures and primers that his office hands out about how Filipinos should learn to conduct themselves when in public, Fernando, who owns a large construction company, was quoted as saying: "I want to be remembered as a builder of character."

His critics, naturally, bristle at such high-mindedness.

For better or worse, Fernando has left his mark in ways that Imelda Marcos could not have imagined. And this means a lot more than just the color pink.

Source: Carlos H. Conde, International Herald Tribune
MONDAY, MARCH 21, 2005


Kahl Consultants has joined to the Marin Green Business Program. It's the local version of the San Francisco Bay Area Green Business Program.


We strongly encourage you to get your business approved with any similar Green Business programs in your area.

It is good publicity and it will help you save money and protect the environment.

Can't get any more sensible than that!

Here is the Marin website:
http://maringreenbusiness.org/

And here is the Bay Area website:
http://www.greenbiz.ca.gov/


Have you ever asked anyone for advice on how to remove a ticks? Don't believe a word you hear!

I recently had a tick bite. And for every bit of folklore advice I received I found a competent source saying that the advice is dead wrong.

There are a LOT of misconceptions about ticks and tick removal out there. Even among professionals!

The Bottom Line:
Do NOT use alchohol, nail polish, hot matches, petroleum jelly, twisting movements or other methods to remove ticks.

These methods may they may make matters worse. They can actually irritate and traumatize ticks stimulating it to release additional saliva or causing them to regurgitate gut contents, which may include the Lyme Disease bacteria, thereby increasing the chances of transmitting the pathogen .

These methods of tick removal should be avoided!

A number of tick removal devices have been marketed, but none are better than a plain set of fine tipped tweezers.

Lets take a closer look at some of these suggestions...

Never twist a tick to remove it, because this can leave part of the tick in your skin.

Other popular--but bad--tick removal advice includes trying to suffocate them by swabbing them with Vaseline, gasoline or nail polish, or holding a hot match to their butts. These methods just piss them off.

Taken from: http://www.straightdope.com/mailbag/mtickoff.html


Ineffective or Dangerous Methods of Removing Ticks: What Not to Do

Do not use sharp forceps.
Do not crush, puncture, or squeeze the tick's body.
Do not apply substances such as petroleum jelly, gasoline, lidocaine (Xylocaine), etc., to the tick.
Do not apply heat with a match or hot nail.
Do not use a twisting or jerking motion to remove the tick.
Do not handle the tick with bare hands.

Taken from: http://www.aafp.org/afp/20020815/643.html

Further References:

1)
http://kidshealth.org/parent/general/body/tick_removal.html

watch the little animation!


2)
http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dvbid/lyme/spotlight/

Study these little images:

Remove attached ticks with tweezers.

1. Use fine-tipped tweezers or shield your fingers with a tissue, paper towel, or rubber gloves (see image, step 1).
2. Grasp the tick as close to the skin surface as possible and pull upward with steady, even pressure (see image, step 2). Do not twist or jerk the tick; this may cause the mouthparts to break off and remain in the skin.
3. Do not squeeze, crush, or puncture the body of the tick.
4. After removing the tick, thoroughly disinfect the bite site and wash your hands with soap and water.
5. Save the tick for identification in case you become ill. This may help your doctor make an accurate diagnosis. Place the tick in a plastic bag and put it in your freezer.

 

3)
http://www.aldf.com/Lyme.asp

how to remove a tick:

If you DO find a tick attached to your skin, there is no need to panic. Not all ticks are infected, and studies of infected deer ticks have shown that they begin transmitting Lyme disease an average of 36 to 48 hours after attachment. Therefore, your chances of contracting LD are greatly reduced if you remove a tick within the first 24 hours. Remember, too, that the majority of early Lyme disease cases are easily treated and cured.

To remove a tick, follow these steps:

1. Using a pair of pointed precision* tweezers, grasp the tick by the head or mouthparts right where they enter the skin. DO NOT grasp the tick by the body.
2. Without jerking, pull firmly and steadily directly outward. DO NOT twist the tick out or apply petroleum jelly, a hot match, alcohol or any other irritant to the tick in an attempt to get it to back out. These methods can backfire and even increase the chances of the tick transmitting the disease.
3. Place the tick in a vial or jar of alcohol to kill it.
4. Clean the bite wound with disinfectant.

*Keep in mind that certain types of fine-pointed tweezers, especially those that are etched, or rasped, at the tips, may not be effective in removing nymphal deer ticks. Choose unrasped fine-pointed tweezers whose tips align tightly when pressed firmly together.


4)
http://www.lyme.org/ticks/removal.html

Tick Removal

Tick's mouthparts have reverse harpoon-like barbs, designed to penetrate and attach to skin. Ticks secrete a cement-like substance that helps them adhere firmly to the host. If you find that you or your pet has been bitten by a tick, it is important to remove it properly.

Tick Removal Procedure:

1) Use fine-point tweezers to grasp the tick at the place of attachment, as close to the skin as possible.
2) Gently pull the tick straight out.
3) Place the tick in a small vial labeled with the victim's name, address and the date.
4) Wash your hands, disinfect the tweezers and bite site.
5) Mark your calendar with the victim's name, place of tick attachment on the body, and general health at the time.
6) Call your doctor to determine if treatment is warranted.
7) Watch the tick-bite site and your general health for signs or symptoms of a tick-borne illness. Make sure you mark any changes in your health status on your calendar.
8) If possible, have the tick identified/tested by a lab, your local health department, or veterinarian.

If the mouthparts break off in the skin - should I dig them out?

We have heard two competing opinions about this.

One viewpoint states that the mouthparts can cause a secondary infection, and should be removed as if it was a splinter.

Another viewpoint was shared with us by a pediatrician in a hyperendemic area. He states that parents can do more harm by trying to hold down a child and dig out the mouthparts with a needle. He instructs his families to leave the mouthparts, and that they will come out on their own as the skin sloughs off.

CAUTIONS:
* If you must remove the tick with your fingers, use a tissue or leaf to avoid contact with infected tick fluids.
* Do not prick, crush or burn the tick as it may release infected fluids or tissue.
* Do not try to smother the tick (e.g. petroleum jelly, nail polish) as the tick has enough oxygen to complete the feeding.

 

5)
http://www.cdc.gov/nasd/docs/d000801-d000900/d000846/d000846.html

FINDING AND REMOVING TICK

Ticks dont fly, jump, or drop from trees. They inhabit shrubby vegetation (nymphs: 4-6" vegetation; adults: waist-high vegetation) and wait fr an animal to brush by. They then grasp the animals fur or skin, and typically crawl up the leg. Ticks will wander on the body for 30-60 minutes before they insert their mouthparts and begin to feed. Infected Deer Ticks must feed for at least 12 - 24 Hours before they can begin to transmit the Lyme Disease bacteria. Therefore you should rem ve ticks as soon as possible. Take a shower after outdoor activity and check your body thoroughly, paying close attention to the armpits, the groin, and neck. Use the buddy system! Look for ticks every night, especially if you have young children.

Remove ticks with tweezers only (bent, "needle-nose" tweezers are best). Do not use alchohol, nail polish, hot matches, petroleum jelly, or other methods to remove ticks. These methods may actually traumatize ticks causing them to regurgitate gut contents, which may include the Lyme Disease bacteria.


6)
http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dvrd/rmsf/Prevention.htm

To remove attached ticks, use the following procedure:

1. Use fine-tipped tweezers or shield your fingers with a tissue, paper towel, or rubber gloves (Figure 17). When possible, persons should avoid removing ticks with bare hands.

2. Grasp the tick as close to the skin surface as possible and pull upward with steady, even pressure (Figure 18). Do not twist or jerk the tick; this may cause the mouthparts to break off and remain in the skin. (If this happens, remove mouthparts with tweezers. Consult your health care provider if infection occurs.)

3. Do not squeeze, crush, or puncture the body of the tick because its fluids (saliva, body fluids, gut contents) may contain infectious organisms.

4. After removing the tick, thoroughly disinfect the bite site and wash your hands with soap and water.

5. Save the tick for identification in case you become ill. This may help your doctor make an accurate diagnosis. Place the tick in a plastic bag and put it in your freezer. Write the date of the bite on a piece of paper with a pencil and place it in the bag.


Kudos to the voters in Marin County!

They passed a measure in 2004 banning the cultivation of genetically engineered plants and animals there.

The measure passed by a large margin - 61 percent to 38 percent - handing another blow to the biotechnology industry, which is already bombarded with criticism from around the world.

The measure makes it illegal for anyone to "propagate, cultivate, raise or grow genetically modified organisms" in the county. Medical research and treatment using GEs are exempt from the ban if it's done in a secure indoor laboratory.

Renata Brillinger, director of Californians for GE Free Agriculture, a coalition of sustainable farming, environmental, and consumer organizations fighting genetically engineered agriculture in the state:
"If you look at eight months ago, there was basically no discussion about this (GE agriculture) in California. I think this is really the beginning of a locally-based movement.

The GE-free movement in California turned up a notch in 2004 when voters in Mendocino became the first county to prohibit the cultivation of GE crops. Then the Trinity County board of supervisors passed a similar law.

Opposition to the four measures on Tuesday's ballot was funneled through the local farm bureaus. The big biotech companies kept a very low profile during the recent campaigns, a shift from the Mendocino measure, when industry lobbying group CropLife International spent around $600,000 - six times more than organizers.

And in Sonoma County organizers are gathering signatures to qualify for a special election in June 2005.

by Kathryn Gillick
Faultline, California's Environmental Magazine

November 04, 2004